-- Einstein.
How to synchronize two clocks.
Synchronize:
1 : to represent or arrange (events) to indicate coincidence or coexistence
2 : to make synchronous in operation
3 : to make (motion-picture sound) exactly simultaneous with the action
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
"In accordance with definition the two clocks synchronize if
Wow! If clock A reads 10.00:00 am and clock B reads 10:00:00 am then 0 = 0 and they synchronize. Big surprise.
But is t'A = tA?
Actually, no, not if we use Einstein's synchronization method.
"If at the point A of space there is a clock, an observer at A can determine the time values of events in the immediate proximity of A by finding the positions of the hands which are simultaneous with these events. If there is at the point B of space another clock in all respects resembling the one at A, it is possible for an observer at B to determine the time values of events in the immediate neighbourhood of B. But it is not possible without further assumption to compare, in respect of time, an event at A with an event at B. We have so far defined only an "A time" and a "B time." We have not defined a common "time" for A and B, for the latter cannot be defined at all unless we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A. Let a ray of light start at the "A time"' from A towards B, let it at the "B time" be reflected at B in the direction of A, and arrive again at A at the "A time". -- Einstein
"Absolute, true, and mathematical time, from its own nature, passes equably without relation the anything external, and thus without reference to any change or way of measuring of time (e.g., the hour, day, month, or year). " -- Sir Isaac Newton.
"Cannot be defined" - Einstein. It can be defined, and it was defined by Sir Isaac Newton.
Einstein is substituting his own definition for Newton's definition, but it is a lie to say time cannot be defined except Einstein's way.
Here are two points, A and B in space. Cassini (B) is one, Earth (A) the other.
A simple calculation reveals the circa 14 seconds difference between the blue second hand and the red second hand is the measurable time difference between the Ritz theory and Einstein's assertion concerning the speed of light. Green error bars have been included for the benefit of the abject moron Dr(ooling) Tom Roberts of Lucent Technologies. To resolve Special Relativity, ask Cassini the time. Even my grandson can measure 14 seconds, although he prefers to play soccer. Shown here on the right, I almost mistook him for Albert in his "imitate Einstein" costume.
Should we set the Earth clock back 67 minutes to agree with Cassini time, or set the Cassini clock back to agree with Earth time? What about next week, when Earth has moved closer to Saturn?
Image taken from http://nso0.livjm.ac.uk/uninow/orrery/ with inner and visible solar systems superimposed. Saturn does not move much in 6 months.
Go outside and look in late April - early May, you will see Mars "near" Saturn along your line of sight.
"For velocities greater than that of light our deliberations become meaningless; we shall, however, find in what follows, that the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity."- Einstein.
"Every triangles are isosceles"- Einstein knew that at the age of 13, in 1892.
http://www.jimloy.com/geometry/every.htm
Einstein plays the part, physically, of Mickey Mouse, and is a liar and an huckster. Certainly Einstein is an incompetent mathematician. And for the clincher:
