A relativist and an anti-relativist at distance:

The same two individuals in close-up:

The proof:  

View your screen at a distance of three metres.

 http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/TwinsEvents.html

"We use 3 inertial reference frames" [because Dorks can't get the result they want in two].
"In neither of these frames any form of acceleration is felt" [neither one of all three].
"In order for the travelling twin to make his trip, she must be in frame S' while going away".
"if T = 5 years and v = 0.8c, then the stay at home twin will have aged 10 years".

Belgium is where the farts blow.

"Your conclusion is dead wrong. Start over, but skip the first part and the conclusion." -- Dork Van de moron.

"You made a mistake" -- Dork Van de psychotic fumble mumbler.
 

Is this guy illiterate and innumerate or what?

ASSistant professor Paul B. Andersen, tusseladd:

"That is, we can reverse the directions of the frames
which is the same as interchanging the frames,
which - as I have told you a LOT of times,
OBVIOUSLY will lead to the transform:
t = (tau-xi*v/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
x = (xi - v*tau)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
or:
tau = (t+xv/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
xi = (x + vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)"
 

Note that (t+xv/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is t+ (something) divided by (something less than one).

The faster you go, the more time it takes to get there.

Clearly relativists are psychotic, blatantly obviously.

Steve Lawrence (sal), another hypocrite:
"In general I'd say there are three main reasons people ignore
questions in this forum.
1) They accidentally overlook the question (not really ignoring it)
2) They think it's boring and don't want to discuss it
3) They can't answer it and don't want to admit that."
Ref: news:pan.2007.01.14.14.05.37.850117@nospam.org

How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to get there?
3) They can't answer it and don't want to admit that.