A A' B
emission reception reflection
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO and you have to
agree because I'm the great genius, STOOOPID, don't you
dare question it. -- Rabbi Albert Einstein
(Einstein's essential unnamed third postulate highlighted in blue)
(as formulated by hahahanson who dances on the Earth and is pristine and pure as the driven snow - or so he claims):
Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?
According to "intuitionist1" <firstname.lastname@example.org> aka Sabbir <email@example.com>
He didn't. You might as well add my name to your list now. Good luck.
According to peeved praise-seeking patronising volunteer schoolmarm Sabbir Sarahman, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
Update from Blind Judas Rosen 8th Sep 2011
We are far removed at this point from your original claim that
Einstein said that the speed of light is c+v and c-v. Obviously, he
never stated it or you would have quoted the statement. Even if
Einstein made another mistake (he didn't), he did not make the mistake
that you claim he made.
There is no c-v or c+v in that inequality, boys and girls. Blind Judas said so. The blind lunatic's rant continues:
Lurkers everywhere. You too, Hanson. I know very well why
Androcles made the statement. Einstein never made the mistake that
Androcles says he made.
I understand also understand why Androcles is saying it. Androcles
is math aphasic. He can't do a word problem in mathematics. He has no
ability to coordinate words with equations. When he reads an equations
with the words that define the symbols, there is a gap in his
understanding between the words and the numbers. Any spurious thought
that crosses his mind is posted on the internet. He will never correct
himself because he is physiologically incapable of understanding
mathematics. Which is not a crime. However, he has another pathology
that forces him to say he understands mathematics.
Androcles likes to claim that it is just Einstein and Lorentz.
However, it is also Newton, Maxwell, Faraday, Leibnitz, Heisenberg and
every other physicist. He picks on Einstein because some people (like
you, Hanson) have a knee jerk reaction to Jews. So these people give
him the credibility that he doesn't deserve.
Whenever I have seen Androcles quote a physicist, any physicist,
he has gotten the meaning wrong. This isn't about Einstein. It is
about Androcles. He always gets it wrong.
According to "Da Do Ron Ron" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Unfortunately Aikas is one of those that only talk and never listen.
According to "Byron Forbes" <email@example.com>
Because he knew he was fudging.
The link between fudge and chocolate caramel isn't clear, but Mr. Forbes has given an acceptable answer.
According to "Robert Carnegie" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
<he ran away>
According to undergraduate "cliverob" email@example.com>
"I can see your inability to understand SR makes you lose your temper"
According to Simpleton "Ray Vickson" <RGVickson@shaw.ca>
It's simple: Einstein never said that. However, lunacy is certainly
something you know a lot about.
According to Raving Simpleton Vickson, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to Numbskull Smiffy ""dlzc" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The "mental model" of the time was the aether, so he had to formulate
to include the effects of an aether. And he never claimed the time
each way was the same,
According to Numbskull Smiffy, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to Baron Victor von Frankenstein' s ASSistant,"Igor" <email@example.com>
"He never said that at all. "
According to Ranting Lunatic "Igor" Hoovler, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to "Quadibloc" <jsav...@ecn.ab.ca>
( news:firstname.lastname@example.org )
"It is generally believed that you intentionally hunted for things you
could take out of context from Einstein's writings"
According to liar Quadiblockhead, it is generally believed Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to imbecile "palsing" <email@example.com>
( news:firstname.lastname@example.org )
"Or, perhaps Uncle Ben said it best..."
According to imbecile "palsing", Uncle Ben wrote Einstein's equation.
According to Bonehead Green Jr. Ph.D. physics 1956 Johns Hopkins "American Man of Science"
"c+v is not the speed of anything w.r.t. anything"
The blue pointer relative to the green ruler travels at half the speed of the blue pointer relative to the red ruler and is "not the speed of anything w.r.t. anything", "it's a closing speed."
"If you want to know where I got my Ph D., look me up in American Men of Science. I am not interested in being interrogated by an ignorant, undisciplined, boor like you. Mental illness is no excuse." - Bonehead Green Jr. Ph.D. physics 1956 Johns Hopkins "American Man of Science"
"I love you too." - Bonehead Green Jr. Ph.D. physics 1956 Johns Hopkins "American Man of Science" and redneck from Schenectady NY.
According to the incredible moron
I'm talking about the spinning gravitational field, not ether.
According to the illiterate crank "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au>
Its two equations.
According to the novice mitch sperkins @gmail.com (or mitchs perkins)
because +v / -v cancel out?
(Actually it should be v-c and v+c, the light changes direction upon reflection, not the emitter, but what would a dork like Einstein know?)____________________________________________________________________________
According to the Pillock Shawn Pollock (mathkills):
Mikelzon Morrly, whatever.
What Einstein does is basically modify Galilean relativity as follows
yes you [Androcles] are an ass (presumably because I asked the question)
So.. x' = (x-vt) = X' = A(X-vt) ...
where did this ignoramus go to school? Math will kill him, he has the right name.
According to galloping glird:
Both x and x' are in the domain of the function x→ x' such that x' = x-vt
According to Idiot Ian Parker:
We are not talking about the speed of light here we are talking
classical stability theory.
According to Cretin harald.vanlintelButNotThis@epfl.ch
Easy: he did NOT say that.
According to moron van lintel, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to xxein (not a true dingleberry):
It is an artefactual/superficially imposed yin-yang of sorts.
According to Lamenting Shubert:
Why do you want to know?
According to Imbecile Jimmy Black:
" In neither system (meaning frame of reference in modern-day terminology)
is the speed of light c-v or c+v. In both systems the speed of light is c."
According to Imbecile Jimmy Black, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to Cretin Dork Bruere
I don't give a damn what Einstein wrote.
According to Lying Little Shit Matthew Johnson
And even the question is wrong! For he never said any such thing.
This should be painfully obvious from what he _did_ say,
namely, that the vacuum speed of light is a constant of nature,
invariant under all admissable [sic] transformations between
inertial reference frames.
Apparently LLS Matthew Johnson has rewritten Einstein's paper.
A team of scientists working under the direction of researchers from the University of Sussex have recently discovered that Einstein did not say "inertial".
According to LLS Matthew Johnson, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to Chief Wanker Uncle Stooopid Schwartz:
"c+v appears nowhere in the paper, nor could it.
According to Chief Wanker Uncle Stooopid, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.
According to Dolt "Spirit of Truth"
The answer is that the movement does not affect the light, but it does change the grating.
A glimpse of true insanity:
A second glimpse of true insanity:
"PD" <email@example.com> wrote in message
He didn't say that, and it's a pity you cannot comprehend what he did say.